fbpx
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: Are there really mostly benefits from making a Mac Mini renderfarm?

Are there really mostly benefits from making a Mac Mini renderfarm? 08 Feb 2014 09:26 #40760

  • Living Smart TV
  • Living Smart TV's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Expert Boarder
  • Expert Boarder
  • TV-vært, blogger, fotograf, forfatter - tjek www.livingsmarttv.dk Sprællemand :)
  • Posts: 86
  • Thank you received: 0
If we set up, say, 4 Mac Mini's, it's my impression that Compressor can automatically distribute rendering between them, right?

It sounds great and the the editing machines will be kept fully available for editing.

But how about the "downsides" - why doesn't "everyone" use this way of encoding? Seems to me that there must be some kind of caveat ?

What are your thoughts about this?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Are there really mostly benefits from making a Mac Mini renderfarm? 08 Feb 2014 12:33 #40768

  • BenB
  • BenB's Avatar
  • Offline
  • User is blocked
  • User is blocked
  • Posts: 10110
  • Karma: -34
  • Thank you received: 1280
Only some codecs benefit, network speed is a bottleneck, etc.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Are there really mostly benefits from making a Mac Mini renderfarm? 30 Sep 2014 08:15 #53423

  • atifali
  • atifali's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Fresh Boarder
  • Posts: 1
  • Thank you received: 0
ncie post good like it





_____________
atif

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by atifali.
  • Page:
  • 1