fbpx
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: YouTube 2018

YouTube 2018 21 Oct 2018 16:18 #97469

  • DmitriZigany
  • DmitriZigany's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 673
  • Karma: 1
  • Thank you received: 25
Hey!

So... Both FCPX and Compressor are still making .mov files in it's YouTube settings that YouTube complains about saying it prefers MP4-files. Why? And does it matter?
What's the current best practices to export from FCPX to YouTube? Settings, formats, etc?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

YouTube 2018 21 Oct 2018 19:48 #97471

  • FCPX.guru
  • FCPX.guru's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • bbalser.com
  • Posts: 3521
  • Karma: 34
  • Thank you received: 487
.mov is a wrapper, that can be one of a wide variety of codecs in the QuickTime library. Yes, the extension may be .mov and it will still be an MP4 codec.

Personally, I upload ProRes 422 files. Takes longer but I get excellent quality, never any issues.

What "complaint" are you referring to with YouTube? I've never seen their upload process warn about .mov files before.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

YouTube 2018 21 Oct 2018 23:44 #97472

  • VTCmedia
  • VTCmedia's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Boarder
  • Senior Boarder
  • Posts: 49
  • Karma: 1
  • Thank you received: 7
Made a 16 second ProRes file with .mov extension. YouTube didn't complain.
Took same file and changed extension to MP4 and no YouTube complaints about mismatched extension. I don't understand why you're getting the warnings. If you prefer the quality MOV offers, change the extension like I did and see what happens.

I never export to YT directly from either FCP or Compressor but first make the file then send it over. If something goes wonky who knows where with the direct export it has to be started all over again and you'll never know what made it choke.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

YouTube 2018 22 Oct 2018 11:52 #97475

  • cseeman
  • cseeman's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 746
  • Karma: 6
  • Thank you received: 59
H.264 .mov to desktop and upload in any browser with Safari, Firefox or Chrome and YouTube throws a warnning that it prefers .mp4. I don't remember the exact wording but I think the warning mentions it'll process faster as an .mp4.

At one time it did make a big difference because there was a time when .mov files had the moov atom at the end of the file rather than the front and this certainly made for slower processing and the encode couldn't happen until it saw the moov atom.

That's no longer the case with H.264 .mov files from FCPX or Compressor. The moov atom should be in the front as it is with .mp4 but YouTube still complains.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by cseeman.

YouTube 2018 22 Oct 2018 14:12 #97476

  • FCPX.guru
  • FCPX.guru's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • bbalser.com
  • Posts: 3521
  • Karma: 34
  • Thank you received: 487
I use .mov files almost daily, and never saw such a warning. I'm making them both ProRes 422 and H.264.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

YouTube 2018 22 Oct 2018 23:23 #97482

  • cseeman
  • cseeman's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 746
  • Karma: 6
  • Thank you received: 59
Uploading today for a client. H.264 .mov at 50mbits using Google Chrome.
I always see this with .mov and never with .mp4
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

YouTube 2018 23 Oct 2018 02:01 #97484

  • FCPX.guru
  • FCPX.guru's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • bbalser.com
  • Posts: 3521
  • Karma: 34
  • Thank you received: 487
It's a suggestion, meh....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

YouTube 2018 23 Oct 2018 17:51 #97494

  • dgwvideo
  • dgwvideo's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 1978
  • Karma: 32
  • Thank you received: 242
We have been getting that message (shown above in cseeman's post) for about 2 years. We generally encode thru Squeeze Desktop Pro (now discontinued) but using all YouTube's specifications, ( i.e 2 consecutive B frames, mp4 container, etc.). But even with Compressor this message appears. Processing still seems reasonably quick though (other than 90 mninute documentaries and such). Some folks are using third party apps to relocate the MOOV atom but I think even doing this YouTube will show that message. I'd ignore it.
Creating history....one edit at a time !

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by dgwvideo.

YouTube 2018 24 Oct 2018 12:35 #97512

  • DmitriZigany
  • DmitriZigany's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 673
  • Karma: 1
  • Thank you received: 25

cseeman wrote: Uploading today for a client. H.264 .mov at 50mbits using Google Chrome.
I always see this with .mov and never with .mp4

That's the one I'm referring too!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

YouTube 2018 24 Oct 2018 12:37 #97513

  • DmitriZigany
  • DmitriZigany's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 673
  • Karma: 1
  • Thank you received: 25
Thanks all!

Was mostly curious to see if anything had changed! I'll go on in the usual way then! ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

YouTube 2018 01 Nov 2018 20:12 #97600

  • Redifer
  • Redifer's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Posts: 856
  • Thank you received: 79
BOTH .mov and .mp4 are container formats. It's probably just your encoder settings not set to "compressed header" or "fast start" or whatever, I forget. But it only affects processing time. it might take 36 seconds to process instead of 31. It won't affect the quality of your video.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

YouTube 2018 01 Nov 2018 21:26 #97602

  • audionstudio
  • audionstudio's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Junior Boarder
  • Junior Boarder
  • Posts: 21
  • Thank you received: 0
Why don't you just use the export to Youtube function builtin the FCPX?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

YouTube 2018 02 Nov 2018 02:45 #97604

  • FCPX.guru
  • FCPX.guru's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Boarder
  • Platinum Boarder
  • bbalser.com
  • Posts: 3521
  • Karma: 34
  • Thank you received: 487
Because it is really, really slow, and really buggy.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Page:
  • 1