- Posts: 730
- Thank you received: 26
3 Post Moderation Rule for New Boarders (25 Jan 2021)
New boarders will have their posts moderated - Don't worry if you cannot see your post immediately.
YouTube 2018
- DmitriZigany
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
So... Both FCPX and Compressor are still making .mov files in it's YouTube settings that YouTube complains about saying it prefers MP4-files. Why? And does it matter?
What's the current best practices to export from FCPX to YouTube? Settings, formats, etc?
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Personally, I upload ProRes 422 files. Takes longer but I get excellent quality, never any issues.
What "complaint" are you referring to with YouTube? I've never seen their upload process warn about .mov files before.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Took same file and changed extension to MP4 and no YouTube complaints about mismatched extension. I don't understand why you're getting the warnings. If you prefer the quality MOV offers, change the extension like I did and see what happens.
I never export to YT directly from either FCP or Compressor but first make the file then send it over. If something goes wonky who knows where with the direct export it has to be started all over again and you'll never know what made it choke.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
At one time it did make a big difference because there was a time when .mov files had the moov atom at the end of the file rather than the front and this certainly made for slower processing and the encode couldn't happen until it saw the moov atom.
That's no longer the case with H.264 .mov files from FCPX or Compressor. The moov atom should be in the front as it is with .mp4 but YouTube still complains.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Creating history....one edit at a time !
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- DmitriZigany
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 730
- Thank you received: 26
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- DmitriZigany
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 730
- Thank you received: 26
Was mostly curious to see if anything had changed! I'll go on in the usual way then!
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
- audionstudio
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
- Posts: 21
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in to join the conversation.
Please Log in to join the conversation.
You are correct as of recently, but it was an option back when this thread was started in 2018.Joshuash wrote:
audionstudio wrote: Why don't you just use the export to Youtube function builtin the FCPX?
As far as I know, this is done using a program.
Creating history....one edit at a time !
Please Log in to join the conversation.







