audio from the monitoring solution brings problem with gui not in sync though, how do you edit with that? Or do you just live/edit with 2 frames out of sync of gui/sound/bcast monitor?
also to be precise, im talking 2-3 frames delay
not much but noticable for editing
Blackmagic Mini Display Monitor, thunderbolt connection
I am wondering how are people editing on their machines with broadcast monitoring devices. These introduce lag and as FCPX doesnt have desktop delay, either there is fcpx GUI or the broadcast monitor delayed.
When working alone I can just use TV as second monitor but thats just preview
1. that doesnt say anything about the quality and color of output even on calibrated display (RGB vs YUV)
2. A/V introduces slight delay too, so i just have to use second display for viewers
3. not proper dealing with various fps (PAL land, cant say for NTSC) in gui viewers, as displays are 60Hz
Would rather prefer robust workstation setup as with all other NLEs where your gui, your output monitoring are in sync, although there is slight delay when u push keys. Ofc no lag anywere is preffered but not sure its possible.
Looking for tips and advice on your setups or workflows of dealing with these
very very interesting findings
fcpchris: what gpu did you use before?
BruceX is basicaly a gpu test, there is very little in terms of cpu testing and disk speed
Can you please do the test without background rendering enabled? Thanks
I dont want to revive this old thread, but maybe this helps someone.
So I had this problem too but when looking at the problem shots in XML, I already had them in Library, but in different Event and adding didnt help and match frame took me to different Event inside this Library.
Way faster solution for me, was to copy the Project to a new Library and exporting XML from the new Library.
Can everybody please note version of system and version of FCPX. As you see, there is big step up in performance between Yosemite and El Capitan. We dont know yet for Sierra. This info is very important. Soon we are going to have results from three different operating systems.
I would suggest a little table to fill in:
HDD: (used for export)
TIME to Prores 422:
thanks in advance
hmm, this would be faster than mac pro with dual 700. are you sure the result is correct? If yes it would be great news but something smells fishy here.
anyone tried the benchmark in fcpx 10.2?
wondering if it makes sense to upgrade to yosemite because of that...
b) Two exact cards are needed for faster rendering
Also, more cores is nice for fcpx, but overall higher cpu speed is better for whole system responsiveness. Not all programs are "many cores aware". More cores and higher mhz is best of course.
when i had x58 hack, the cpu would overlock to 3.6Ghz easily, maybe you can oc while getting more cores (don't know if your client has mac or hack)